| Feature Article 31.4.3 |
Post-pandemic: Lasting Changes to Law Firms and the Delivery of Legal ServicesWritten by: Todd C. Scott, Minnesota Lawyer’s Mutual Insurance Company, Minneapolis MN With countless challenges faced by legal professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic, and many system modifications necessary for most firms to stay in business, there is no doubt that the events of 2020 will have a lasting impact on the legal profession. The pandemic is not over, and there is much analysis that needs to occur to determine its lasting impact on the legal profession. But it seems clear that changes in the practice of law during 2020 has significantly impacted the legal profession in three ways:
The pandemic’s legal winners and losersOne of the best resources for determining the overall effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on lawyers in private practice is the 2020 Legal Trends Report, recently published by Themis Solutions, Inc., the makers of Clio legal practice management and client intake software. See https://www.clio.com/resources/legal-trends/2020-report/. When reviewing the data in these studies, it is clear 2020 started out looking like it would be a pretty good year for attorneys. From January to February 2020, the national average for monthly new matter volume jumped in a year-over-year comparison. Monthly billing volume also jumped nationally at the start of the year, when comparing year-over-year billing averages, adjusted for annual growth. (See Figure 1 and Figure 2.)
Figure 1. New Matter Volume 2020 (US average) Source: Themis Solutions, Inc. (Clio), COVID-19’s Impact on the Legal Industry, https://www.clio.com/resources/legal-trends/covid-impact/.
Figure 2. Monthly Billing Volume 2020 (US average) – Year over Year, adjusted for growth Source: Themis Solutions, Inc. (Clio), COVID-19’s Impact on the Legal Industry, https://www.clio.com/resources/legal-trends/covid-impact/. One of the most revealing trends in the Clio studies is the impact of COVID-19 on practice areas. Certain practice areas—primarily in the areas of business formation, business transactions, commercial sale of goods, intellectual property, and real property—fared well in 2020, even during the darkest days of the pandemic. (See Figure 3.)
Figure 3. Practice Area Caseloads Less Effected by COVID-19 Pandemic – Jan-Aug 2020 Source: Themis Solutions, Inc. (Clio), COVID-19’s Impact on the Legal Industry, https://www.clio.com/resources/legal-trends/covid-impact/.
Figure 4. Practice Area Caseloads Less Effected by COVID-19 Pandemic – Jan-Aug 2020 Source: Themis Solutions, Inc. (Clio), COVID-19’s Impact on the Legal Industry, https://www.clio.com/resources/legal-trends/covid-impact/.
For legal professionals, the great leap forward into advanced cloud-based systems was long overdue. The state of law office technology advanced about 10 years in less than 10 months. And not a moment too soon, since research estimates show that consumers have embraced technology much more since the pandemic began. Consider the following from the Clio study:
Rapid change in law office systems often produces additional risks. The lagging effect of system failures can occur when end-users do not anticipate the increase in risk-prone exposures due to not fully understanding the new technology. A classic example of increased risk-hazards due to a lack of understanding of new technology is the many instances of “Zoom bombing” that occurred early in 2020. Zoom bombing is where uninvited users log into Zoom meetings and disrupt the proceedings, occasionally performing criminal acts, visible to other members of the Zoom session. Instances of Zoom bombing were curtailed once end-users learned how to use the security settings of the communication tool, and the manufacturers of Zoom updated their software to add safety-related defaults to the product. Attorneys were not thrilled with the prospect of real-time, electronic communications with clients when email was first developed. Many attorneys felt that email communications were inherently unsafe due to the mysterious way the communications traveled from one user to another—never knowing which third-party server may have played a role in the electronic conveyance. Yet, despite attorney concerns, email became widely adopted by attorneys, primarily because consumers of legal services demanded it. Clients liked the speed, convenience, ease-of-use, and affordability that email communications had to offer. The same may be said for today’s wide-spread use of audio-visual communication tools by attorneys during the pandemic. Long-distance audio-visual communication tools may have been necessary during isolation and social distancing requirements brought on by the pandemic, but if clients find the new tools to be preferable over a costly and time-consuming personal visit to their attorney’s law office, then the demand for the tools will stay long after necessity for social distancing has passed. Permanent changes in the delivery of legal servicesSpecifically, lawyers responding to the Clio survey reported that they plan to use technology well-beyond the pandemic in several ways:
Lasting changes to the legal profession brought forth by COVID-19 and the resulting pandemic may also influence changes some believe are necessary to achieve efficiency and accessibility in the judiciary. Any added efficiencies to the judiciary may impact the widespread concern for access to justice and the overall affordability of legal services. In short, changes to the legal profession may keep on coming. The Clio 2020 study describes the lasting impact of COVID-19 changes for law firms in positive terms: “Beyond 2020, the future will remain cloud-based and client-centered.” The implication in the statement is that the ultimate beneficiaries of changes in the legal profession are the clients who seek legal services. Clients may begin to experience online and cloud-based deliveries of legal products and services in ways that previously were only available to consumers in other industries. After the pandemic, almost every firm has become a virtual firm. The impact of client communication and document creation tools that do not require the physical presence of the client is allowing legal practitioners to offer advice and services well-beyond their home market. Consequently, growth in the number of firms providing long-distance delivery of legal services may result in more competition for consumers of legal services that previously were only served by attorneys within the consumer’s region. Much can be said about the growing risks that often occur when an industry undergoes rapid change in the way it delivers products and services to consumers. To insurance and risk management professionals, anticipating risks associated with rapid change is paramount for providing proper support to attorneys in private practice who may run into bumps in the road. To attorneys, simply being aware that risk factors increase during times of change is good risk management for practitioners who plan to guide their firm safely and successfully well into the future. About the AuthorTodd C. Scott is the Vice President of Risk Management for Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company. He is a frequent author and guest lecturer on the topics of malpractice, ethics, and practice management systems. Much of his duties include helping lawyers select and implement software systems appropriate to their particular practice. Mr. Scott had previously served as Attorney/Claims Representative for MLM, and was the head of their technology subsidiary, Mutual Software. Mr. Scott is also an adjunct professor in the Legal Studies Department at Hamline University in St. Paul, Minnesota He is a graduate of Hamline University School of Law and is a member of the American Bar Association, the Nebraska State Bar Association, and the Minnesota State Bar Association, where he has served as past Chair of the Practice Management & Marketing Section. |
12/11/2025
The Modern Defense of Damages
12/11/2025
Holiday Party
Andrew Kopon Jr. Wins Appeal Before U.S. Seventh Circuit
Adrian Mendoza and Edward R. Sherman Obtain Summary Judgment Ruling
Smith and Chaddock Obtain Directed Verdict for Hospital
Linda Hay and Susan Wagener Secure Defense Verdict in Med Mal/LTC Trial