Quarterly Column Archives - Volumes 18 & 19

Share |

Volume 19 | Published 2009

Volume 18 | Published 2008

Volume 19, Number 4

Volume 19, Number 3

Volume 19, Number 2

Volume 19, Number 1

Volume 18, Number 4

Volume 18, Number 3

Volume 18, Number 2

Volume 18, Number 1

Volume 19 | Published 2009

Volume 19, Number 4
19.4.M1	Index of IDC Monograph and Feature Articles Volumes 10-19
19.4.2	President's Message
19.4.3	Editor's Note
19.4.5	Feature Article: Employer Liability for Supervisor Sexual Harassment — A Comparison of Federal and State Standards
19.4.10	Civil Rights Update
19.4.12	Recent Decisions
19.4.16	Insurance Law
19.4.19	Workers' Compensation Report
19.4.20	Civil Practice and Procedure
19.4.22	Feature Article: Enforceable High/Low Settlement Agreements
19.4.30	Property Insurance
19.4.32	Appellate Practice Corner
19.4.36	Evidence and Practice Tips
19.4.39	Professional Liability
19.4.42	Feature Article: Use of Income Tax Returns, or Failure to File Them, to Diminish Damages for Lost Income or to Attack Plaintiff’s Credibility
19.4.45	Employment Law
19.4.50	Product Liability
19.4.54	Commercial Law
19.4.55	The Defense Philosophy
19.4.56	Amicus Committee Report
19.4.57	Young Lawyers Report
Volume 19, Number 3
19.3.M1	IDC Monograph: A Guide to the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 and New FMLA Regulations
19.3.4	President's Message
19.3.5	Editor's Note
19.3.7	Did Someone Mention Lilly Ledbetter? U.S. Supreme Court Provides Insight on the Lilly Ledbetter Act in a Pension Case
19.3.9	Medical Malpractice
19.3.12	Civil Rights Update
19.3.18	Product Liability
19.3.21	Civil Rights Update
19.3.23	E-Discovery
19.3.26	Supreme Court Watch
19.3.28	Property Insurance
19.3.30	Defining the Retained Control Exception: An Update on §414
19.3.34	Civil Practice and Procedure
19.3.36	Health Law
19.3.38	Recent Decisions
19.3.42	Insurance Law
19.3.45	Legal Ethics
19.3.47	Appellate Practice Corner
19.3.51	Com mercial Law
19.3.52	The Defense Philosophy
19.3.53	Amicus Committee Report
19.3.54	Young Lawyers Report
19.3.56	Association News
Volume 19 Number 2
19.2.M1	IDC Monograph: Can You Still Have an Illinois Class Action in a Mass Tort Case? Illinois Class Action Rules for Mass Tort Cases
19.2.2	President's Message
19.2.3	Editor's Note
19.2.5	Candidates for Board of Directors 2009-2010
19.2.10	Rule 213: Lost in Translation?
19.2.24	Legal Ethics
19.2.26	Diversity
19.2.27	Professional Liability
19.2.29	Technology Law
19.2.32	Workers' Compensation
19.2.34	Feature Article: Beating Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Against Lawyers at the Pleading Stage
19.2.40	Employment Law
19.2.44	Commercial Law
19.2.45	Supreme Court Watch
19.2.48	The Illinois Citizen Participation Act Provides Immunity for the Exercise of First Amendment Rights
19.2.51	Feature Article: The 95th General Assembly
19.2.54	Recent Decisions
19.2.57	Insurance Law
19.2.59	E-Discovery
19.2.61	Municipal Law
19.2.64	Civil Practice and Procedure
19.2.65	The Defense Philosophy
19.2.66	Amicus Committee Report
19.2.68	Young Lawyers Report
Volume 19, Number 1
19.1.M1	IDC Monograph: Defending the Insurance Producer: Duties, Proximate Cause Defenses and Avoiding Punitive Damages
19.1.2	President's Message
19.1.4	Editor's Note
19.1.5	Voir Dire — a Plaintiff’s Perspective
19.1.8	Voir Dire — a Defense Perspective
19.1.14	Civil Practice and Procedure
19.1.16	Supreme Court Watch
19.1.19	Medical Malpractice
19.1.22	Smith v. Waukegan Park District:Tort Immunity No Longer Available for Governmental Entities in Defense of Certain Retaliatory Discharge Claims
19.1.25	Municipal Law
19.1.27	Recent Decisions
19.1.32	Feature Article: The Appellate Court Administers a Healthy Dose of Common Sense to the Vehicle Photograph Admissibility Issue
19.1.38	Employment Law
19.1.41	Insurance Law
19.1.44	Feature Article: Racking Up Attorney Fees under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act: Simple Solutions to Prevent Attorney Abuse
19.1.50	Diversity
19 1.51	Legislative Update
19.1.53	Technology Law
19.1.57	Property Insurance
19.1.60	Commercial Law
19.1.61	E-Discovery
19.1.63	Feature Article: Significant Changes in the Americans With Disabilities Act
19.1.66	Workers' Compensation Report
19.1.69	Professional Liability
19.1.71	Feature Article: Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Company - A Synthesis of Approaches in Design Defect Cases
19.1.81	Health Law
19.1.83	The Defense Philosophy
19.1.84	Amicus Committee Report
19.1.86	Young Lawyers Report
Volume 18 \| Published 2008
Volume 18, Number 4
18.4.M1	IDC Monograph: Illinois Temporary Total Disability: Workers’ Compensation Theory and Issues
18.4.2	President's Message
18.4.4	Editor's Note
18.4.5	Feature Article: Advising Small Manufacturing Clients on the Reporting Requirements Under the Consumer Product Safety Act
18.4.9	Legal Ethics
18.4.10	Recent Decisions
18.4.15	Legislative Update
18.4.17	Employment Law
18.4.20	Health Law
18.4.23	Technology Law
18.4.26	Feature Article: Wills v. Foster: A Split Decision in the Battle Between Compensatory Damages and the Collateral Source Rule
18.4.33	Property Insurance
18.4.35	Commercial Law
18.4.36	Appellate Practice Corner
18.4.38	Workers' Compensation Report
18.4.40	Feature Article: Laying it on the Line: Ethical Issues in Crossing State Lines to Conduct Depositions
18.4.43	Evidence and Practice Tips
18.4.46	Civil Rights Update
18.4.48	Medical Malpractice
18.4.52	Feature Article: The Illinois Supreme Court Introduces New Element of Compensable Damages: Shortened Life Expectancy
18.4.56	Product Liability
18.4.60	Municipal Law
18.4.62	Civil Practice and Procedure
18.4.65	Amicus Committee Report
18.4.66	The Defense Philosophy
18.4.67	Young Lawyers Division
Volume 18, Number 3
18.3.M1	IDC Monograph: On the Road From Park Ridge to Springfield The Illinois Supreme Court Will Determine Whether Sections 6-105 and 6-106 of the Tort Immunity Act Bar Plaintiffs ’ Claims for Failure to Provide Medical Services
18.3.2	President's Message
18.3.4	Editor's Note
18.3.5	Letter to the Editor
18.3.8	Feature Article: Barth v. State Farm Leveling the Playing Field
18.3.13	Supreme Court Watch
18.3.15	Evidence and Practice Tips
18.3.18	Workers' Compensation Report
18.3.19	Civil Rights Update
18.3.22	Legal Ethics
18.3.24	Appellate Practice Corner
18.3.27	Commercial Law
18.3.28	Feature Article: A Trap for the Unwary: Two-Year Statute of Limitations for Actions Against Insurance Brokers
18.3.31	Health Law
18.3.33	Legislative Update
18.3.34	Employment Law
18.3.37	Technology Law
18.3.41	Insurance Law
18.3.43	Professional Liability
18.3.46	Recent Decisions
18.3.48	Product Liability
18.3.51	Amicus Committee Report
18.3.53	The Defense Philosophy
18.3.54	Young Lawyers Report
18.3.56	Association News
Volume 18, Number 2
18.2.M1	IDC Monograph: The Struggle Over Selective Waiver and the Production of Confidential Information to the Government
18.2.2	President's Message
18.2.3	Editor's Note
18.2.4	Feature Article: Continuing Developments in Construction Negligence
18.2.9	Recent Decisions
18.2.11	Legal Ethics
18.2.13	Civil Rights Update
18.2.15	Supreme Court Watch
18.2.18	Diversity
18.2.19	Evidence and Practice Tips
18.2.21	Health Law
18.2.23	Commercial Law
18.2.25	Workers' Compensation Report
18.2.26	Employment Law
18.2.30	Insurance Law
18.2.32	Medical Malpractice
18.2.35	Appellate Practice Corner
18.2.38	Professional Liability
18.2.40	Civil Practice and Procedure
18.2.42	Property Insurance
18.2.45	Technology Law
18.2.49	Amicus Committee Report
18.2.52	Young Lawyers Report
18.2.54	The Defense Philosophy
18.2.56	Association News
Volume 18, Number 1
18.1.M1	IDC Monograph: Judicial Approach to Medical Malpractice Reform
18.1.2	President's Message
18.1.3	Editor's Note
18.1.4	Feature Article: What To Do with the Leftovers? Residual Funds in Class Action Common Funds Under 735 ILCS 5/2-807
18.1.7	Employment Law
18.1.11	Workers' Compensation Report
18.1.16	Civil Rights Update
18.1.18	Supreme Court Watch
18.1.21	Medical Malpractice
18.1.23	Appellate Practice Corner
18.1.24	Health Law
18.1.26	Recent Decisions
18.1.29	Insurance Law
18.1.33	Commercial Law
18.1.35	E-Discovery
18.1.37	Product Liability
18.1.41	Evidence and Practice Tips
18.1.43	Municipal Law
18.1.46	Amicus Committee Report
18.1.48	Feature Article: Judicial Estoppel Based on a Judicial Admission Should be Decided on a Dispositive Motion